This editorial policy describes how Mindivr intends to treat evidence on the site. It is a publication standard, not a claim of an external review board or institutional affiliation.
Evidence and interpretation
Reported findings should be distinguishable from the author’s reading of those findings. Language that sounds more certain than the source should be revised.
Sources
Important claims should be grounded in inspectable references. Readers should be able to see where a statement comes from.
Careful wording and uncertainty
Gaps, limits, and disagreement in the literature should remain visible. A visual explainer must not hide uncertainty behind a stronger headline.
Updates
When a story needs a material correction or an update, the change should be recorded on the page rather than silently rewritten.
Editorial responsibility
A human editor is responsible for what Mindivr publishes. This site does not claim an independent scientific review board.
Mindivr has not published a separate AI-authorship disclosure on this site. If AI-assisted drafting is part of the production workflow, that disclosure belongs in an owner-approved update to this page.